Journal article
Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable
SE John, NL Opie, YT Wong, GS Rind, SM Ronayne, G Gerboni, SH Bauquier, TJ O'Brien, CN May, DB Grayden, TJ Oxley
Scientific Reports | NATURE PORTFOLIO | Published : 2018
Abstract
Recent work has demonstrated the feasibility of minimally-invasive implantation of electrodes into a cortical blood vessel. However, the effect of the dura and blood vessel on recording signal quality is not understood and may be a critical factor impacting implementation of a closed-loop endovascular neuromodulation system. The present work compares the performance and recording signal quality of a minimally-invasive endovascular neural interface with conventional subdural and epidural interfaces. We compared bandwidth, signal-to-noise ratio, and spatial resolution of recorded cortical signals using subdural, epidural and endovascular arrays four weeks after implantation in sheep. We show t..
View full abstractRelated Projects (8)
Grants
Awarded by Office of Naval Research
Funding Acknowledgements
We thank Covidien (Medtronic) for provision of 30 Solitaire stentriever devices as a product research grant. T. Dornum, A. McDonald and T. Vale for surgical and animal handling assistance. We also acknowledge Prof. A. Burkitt, Mr. A. Meltzer, Mr. Stefan Wilson, and Mr. T. Scordas for their support and input. This work was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Project Grant APP1062532, US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Microsystems Technology Office contract N66001-12-1- 4045; Office of Naval Research (ONR) lobal N62909-14-1-N020; Defence Health Foundation, Australia (Booster Grant); and the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program.